Veritas-bu

[Veritas-bu] Multiple Net Interfaces/Load balancing

2000-06-29 10:05:23
Subject: [Veritas-bu] Multiple Net Interfaces/Load balancing
From: Scott Tinsley tinsley AT theALLIEDgroup DOT com
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 10:05:23 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------DC04F957597FF193F512BFDC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Dave,

I am no NB expert, so bear with me...

If I have a class(Class1) with say 4 clients. I direct that class to a "Storage 
Unit" (SU1) for backup. That "Storage Unit" is made up of 2 media servers 
sharing a common robot (TLD). Can I define a second storage unit(SU2), built 
using different names/IPs that refernce those same two media servers? This 
would allow me to define another class of clients(Class2) and direct them to a 
SU2 and that second virtual storage unit would really just reference the same 2 
media servers by different IP addresses. Would this result in the clients in 
the second class sending their backups to the specific interfaces that use the 
second set of addresses, versus the IP/NICs defined for use by the first 
storage unit?

REQUIRED_INTERFACE restricts use from a NB node on packets going out, correct. 
I am actually trying to get clients to use more than 1 interface on the media 
servers so I do not bottleneck on one 100Mbps interface. I have 8 DLT7000 
drives. I cannot push more than 80MB/s thru 1 net interface in a perfect world. 
I know I will need to keep multiple net interfaces fed client data to keep the 
8 DLT drives running near full capacity, right? And I am not in a position to 
trunk.

Scott

Dave Little wrote:
> 
> If the different NICs have different names then the clients and media
> servers can be called by the preferred name and this will direct traffic
> over the named network.  If you are running 3.2 there is also a required
> interface name parameter that can be setup on the client to direct all
> traffic on a specific interface.
> 
> Dave
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Tinsley [mailto:tinsley AT theALLIEDgroup DOT com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 8:25 AM
> To: Everett, Craig; Veritas Backup Mail List
> Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple Net Interfaces/Load balancing
> 
> We are restricted from trunking to a certain degree; time, money, other
> products on boxes configured expecting individual NICs. Trunking is the
> answer in the perfect world, but I am not currently in that world.
> 
> By the way, Veritas support has told me that configuring NB clients to talk
> to a particular IP/NIC on a Netbackup server, where multiple are available,
> is not supported in Netbackup. No plans either.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott
> 
> h
> "Everett, Craig" wrote:
> >
> > I just use the trunking method. I have installed several NIC's which I
> have
> > trunked together to propagate as one IP.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Tinsley [mailto:tinsley AT theALLIEDgroup DOT com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 10:28 AM
> > To: Everett, Craig
> > Subject: Re: [Veritas-bu] Multiple Net Interfaces/Load balancing
> >
> > "Everett, Craig" wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > You can balance each client to a particular NIC on your master or if NT
> > > supports it you can trunk your interfaces on your master and just send
> > them
> > > all to that port.
> > >
> > Craig,
> >
> > Thanks for the info. You mentioned sending a client to a particular NIC on
> > the master. That is what I am shooting for.
> > Can you possibly direct me to where that capability is documented? I
> looked
> > at the admin guide and user's guide for NB and had no luck.
> >
> > Scott
> > >
> > > Craig Everett
> > > Intuit Inc
> > > System Admin
> > > craig_everett AT intuit DOT com
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Scott Tinsley [mailto:tinsley AT theALLIEDgroup DOT com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 8:21 AM
> > > To: 'veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu'
> > > Subject: [Veritas-bu] Multiple Net Interfaces/Load balancing
> > >
> > > I am running Netbackup 3.2. My master is an NT host. My netbackup
> > > slaves/media servers are 3 Sun E4500s connected to a single SUN L11000
> > tape
> > > library. Each slave server has multiple NICs all connected on the same
> > > subnet on an enet switch. I am curious about the best way to balance the
> > > clients such that they utiulize all available server NICs.
> > >
> > > Can one of you Netbackup Gurus please point me to some documentation on
> > how
> > > to balance client backups across a Netbackup server that has mutiple IP
> > > interfaces, all on the same network subnet, in a switched network
> > > environment?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Scott Tinsley
--------------DC04F957597FF193F512BFDC
Content-Type: text/x-vcard; charset=us-ascii;
 name="tinsley.vcf"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: Card for Scott Tinsley
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="tinsley.vcf"

begin:vcard 
n:Tinsley;Scott
tel;pager:800-758-8888 Pin Number 1158965
tel;cell:804-304-1122
tel;fax:804-204-1733
tel;home:804-530-8662
tel;work:804-204-1750  X103
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:www.thealliedgroup.com
org:The Allied Group;SNS
version:2.1
email;internet:tinsley AT theallidegroup DOT com
title:Senior System Engineer
adr;quoted-printable:;;2104 West Laburnum Ave.=0D=0ASuite 
100;Richmond;VA;23227;USA
x-mozilla-cpt:;10544
fn:Scott Tinsley
end:vcard

--------------DC04F957597FF193F512BFDC--




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>