Networker

Re: [Networker] networker server as VM

2013-06-24 09:33:55
Subject: Re: [Networker] networker server as VM
From: "Roberts, Justin (GE, Appl & Light)" <Justin.Roberts2 AT GE DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:25:36 +0000
Our entire environment is running on virtual machines backing up to Data 
Domain.  We haven't seen any issues with them being virtual and EMC has fully 
supported them for us. 

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Stanley R. Horwitz
Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2013 4:27 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] networker server as VM

Dave,

Does EMC support deploying NetWorker in a virtual server environment? With the 
heavy network bandwidth that backups typically require, as well as high 
processor load, I couldn't imagine virtualizing a backup server in any 
environment where there are more than just a few backup clients. It also seems 
to me that hosting a virtualized backup server in the same VMware complex that 
is being backed up amounts to putting all of one's eggs in a single basket. 
What happens if the ESX server that host's the NetWorker server crashes, or its 
storage crashes?

On Jun 19, 2013, at 2:10 PM, <dave2 AT CAMBRIDGECOMPUTER DOT COM<mailto:dave2 
AT CAMBRIDGECOMPUTER DOT COM>> wrote:

Hi,

I was wondering what folks experience was with having their NetWorker server 
configured as a VM?


I'm specifically thinking about the need to have a local device for indexes and 
bootstraps. How have you dealt with that in an all tape (or FC-only
VTL) environment?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>