*@*

worked for me ;)



From:   Rick Brode <rick AT BRODETRAINING DOT COM>
To:     NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date:   11/27/2012 02:59 PM
Subject:        Re: [Networker] Confused about MS cluster client restores
Sent by:        EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>



Michael,

Either syntax is valid.  However, the "user=???,host=???" syntax is a
bit more precise and is what EMC recommends.

Rick

On 11/27/2012 12:44 PM, Michael Leone wrote:
>> Yes, it should be the name of the user performing the recovery.
>> (user=????,host=phys_host)
> I don't have the user listed in that format; I have
"logged-in-user@node".
> Does it need to be in that other format? I use that format in the
> ADMINISTRATORS group in NMC ...
>
> I added the console user (i.e., the logged-in user) as above to the
REMOTE
> ACCESS, and I do see the virtual clients as SOURCE and DESTINATION
> clients, when doing a RECOVER. Seemed to take a long while for NWUSER to
> come up, but that may just be a transient condition.
>
> Thanks so much for clearing that up.
>
>> On 11/27/2012 11:05 AM, Michael Leone wrote:
>>> Hmmm ... in the REMOTE ACCESS section of that virtual client, I
>>> already have SYSTEM@NODE1 SySTEM@NODE2 Does it need to be the logged
>>> in username, that is attempting to run the recover? I want to avoid
>>> giving just generic access (i.e., "*@*") in that field, so I guess I
>>> need to list the logged in user?