Re: [Networker] Is NetWorker really compatible with RHEL 6.2?
2012-02-23 07:03:24
On 2/21/12 2:53 PM, Tim Mooney wrote:
> Please let the list know what the issue turns out to be. It will very
> likely be useful to others.
It is unknown what the issue was because engineering was unable to analyze the
dumps that were
produced. Their determination was that either the stack was corrupted or the
dump was truncated.
Therefore, EMC provided me a debugging binary (a non-stripped rebuild I think),
and since they
had no clue, I applied OS maintenance at the same time that I put on the
debugging binary
(after 3.5 days of not having a backup server, I wasn't allowed to just put on
a new binary
that was purely for gathering more information). That has "resolved" the
issue... Now, I'm
working to burrow into the "why were the dumps useless" question.
--
Frank Swasey | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont | just like everyone else.
"I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|