Networker

Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS

2011-07-22 12:37:24
Subject: Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS
From: Chester Martin <cmartin AT SPP DOT ORG>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:35:35 -0500
Also if "fullvmfs" is the vadp equivalent to vcb's "allvmfs" it may not grab 
system state data.

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Eugene Vilensky
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 11:02 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] VMware VADP FULLVM vs FULLVMFS

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Morton, Jeffrey < Jeffrey.Morton AT multiplan 
DOT com> wrote:

> To those that are using the NetWorker VMware VADP integration, is 
> there any particular reason you would use FULLVMFS over an image 
> considering you can recover files from the image as well?


FULLVMFS isn't supported on non-NTFS file systems is one good reason.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>