Networker

Re: [Networker] Why isn't this saveset browseable?

2010-09-22 10:28:06
Subject: Re: [Networker] Why isn't this saveset browseable?
From: Michael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 10:25:44 -0400
Anyone?

> I am confused about something. I scanned this old saveset back in from 
> tape (had no index backup, and it was originally made on a foreign NW 
> server). I have a client with the same client ID as what's on the tape, 
> and I knew the ssid to scan for. 
> 
>  volume   ssid          clone id     date     time         browse time 
> retention time      lvl ssflags fl total size
> 01056776  2932379725  1204358776 02/29/2008 06:07:56 PM 02/20/2016 
> 02:41:32 PM 02/20/2016 02:41:32 PM full vrF tr 572 GB 130 GB
> 897264    2932379725  1204358776 02/29/2008 06:07:56 PM 02/20/2016 
> 02:41:32 PM 02/20/2016 02:41:32 PM full vrF mr 572 GB 98 GB
> 897304    2932379725  1204358776 02/29/2008 06:07:56 PM 02/20/2016 
> 02:41:32 PM 02/20/2016 02:41:32 PM full vrF mr 572 GB 118 GB
> 915345    2932379725  1204358776 02/29/2008 06:07:56 PM 02/20/2016 
> 02:41:32 PM 02/20/2016 02:41:32 PM full vrF hr 572 GB 224 GB
> 
> (I'm sure that will break badly, in the email)
> 
> Anyway, the browse time is still 6 years in the future, as is the 
> retention. Yet the ssflags and sumflags are indicating "recoverable" and 

> not "browsable". And I don't know why ... The saveset itself is already 
> not recyclable
> 
> C:\>nsrmm -s admnman004 -o notrecyclable -S 2932379725/1204358776
> Mark save set copy 2932379725/1204358776 as not recyclable? yes
> Save set `2932379725' cloneid `1204358776' is already not eligible
> 
> So what did I miss? Why is this not browsable? The only thing I can 
think 
> of is that maybe the tapes were not scanned in the proper order? I mean, 
I 
> can probably try deleting the saveset, then doing a "scanner -m" in the 
> order shown above, and then a "scanner -i", to rebuild the index, but 
> that's tedious at best, at approx 3 hours to scan each SDLT320 tape, 
> that's 8 scans, and will take me half the week to do ..
> 
> Anything else I can try? Or more info to look at?

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>