In my personal experience AFTDs do give better compression performance.

*** KISS = Don't over engineer the solution

Semper fidelis, /ALE

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of thwkman
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 2:34 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Networker and Data Domain dedup ratios

Networker 7.6, DD880 4.9.0.3 VTL mode getting 7.5X dedup ratio. Good?
Bad? Best wew can expect? This ain't cutting it, we wondering whether
AFTD might be better? We use Vranger on a Cifs share to the DD880 and
have seen 12x but we're still in pilot on that. COmments, suggestions,
ideas welcome.  thanks

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER