Unfortunatelly, I totally agree with Davina on the NMM.

And EMC is aiming on replacing the conventional NetWorker client with the NMM 
for MS systems. 

How do you like that?

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Davina Treiber
Sent: 30. maí 2010 18:47
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] scipted backup and restores using NMM for MSSQL 
databases

On 05/27/10 03:41, rovinabi wrote:

>    The only draw back with NMM is "You cannot do a client initiated backup".

The only drawback?  I wish it was the only one. How about complexity,
obscurity, lack of decent logs, dependence on flaky MS services...
That's just for a start.  ;-)

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER