Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?
2010-03-19 17:42:12
On 20/03/2010, at 08:32 , Tim Mooney wrote:
> In regard to: Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair said (at...:
>
>> Seems then that it's picking this up automatically? Is there any need for me
>> to set the 'Volume default capacity'?
>
> If the tape drives are actually configured as LTO4 drives, then I would
> say no.
>
> Generally, you only want to override NetWorker's notion of a volume
> default capacity if you've done something like
>
> - bought LTO-5 drives hot off the assembly line
> - are running a NetWorker version that doesn't yet have a built-in
> idea of what LTO-5 drives have for capacity
>
>
> If NetWorker actually knows about the type of drive you have, then I
> would just leave volume default capacity alone.
Actually there's another good reason where you should be setting the Volume
Default Capacity – and that's for use with VTLs. This way rather than NetWorker
constantly reporting that it's getting a heck of a lot less capacity than
expected on the virtual media (e.g., virtual media configured as LTO-4, but
setup to be 100GB in size), it will react and work with media of the "correct"
size. This is something I blogged about recently -
http://nsrd.info/blog/2010/02/27/basic-svtls-and-default-media-sizes/
Cheers,
Preston.
--
Preston de Guise
http://nsrd.info/blog NetWorker Blog
http://www.enterprisesystemsbackup.com "Enterprise Systems Backup and
Recovery: A corporate insurance policy"
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Len Philpot
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?,
Preston de Guise <=
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, George Sinclair
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Tim Mooney
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, A Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] Volume capacity?, Len Philpot
|
|
|