> Tim Mooney 
> 
> I've been told by EMC support that it is faster to use scanner -m 
followed
> by nsrck -L7 (if the index saveset becomes available as a result of the
> scanner -m) than it is to use scanner -i.  I've never timed it, so I 
can't
> vouch for the accuracy of that information.

FWIW, I used that procedure just the other day to resurrect one expired 
SSID and it worked fine. I've also used scanner -i many times in the past, 
but the backups were not comparable so I can't comment on relative speed. 
Overall, the scanner -m / nsrck -L7 took a bit less actual "rolling tape" 
time, but then again I was scanning only a single saveset (+index) and not 
the whole tape as with the scanner -i.

??
The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. 
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this message by anyone else 
is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, 
copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you 
in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful. Please delete the message 
and immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER