You would think given the fact that EMC owns RSA the expertise would be
available to implement this rather well.

Keep the pressure up.  Somebody will notice.

On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 2:32 PM, MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT pha.phila DOT 
gov>
wrote:

EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on
02/04/2010 08:59:20 AM:

> Hey everyone...
>
> Back in November, I posted the message below.  To this moment, I haven't

> heard anything from anyone.... I guess I need to take from that silence
> one of three truths:
>
>   1) No one is interested in NetWorker handling the management of keys
> to encrypt LTO4 media.

I'd be interested.

>   2) I'm the only person on the list that is using LTO4 media and trying

> to figure out how to handle encryption.

I use LTO-4, and may have to move to encryption in the future, so I'd be
interested in hearing about it, as a sort of head start.

>   3) It was too close to Christmas and no one took the time to read my
> message.

DING! DING! I think we have a winner! LOL

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER