Frank

On 11/23/09 10:04 AM, Hawkins, Michael wrote:

That's why if its not broke then ...I'd still be on 6.11 but NDMP and dynamic drives made me move. We are 7.33. Good but could be better.

----- Original Message -----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Sent: Mon Nov 23 08:56:02 2009
Subject: Re: [Networker] NetWorker 7.6 Binaries/Installers now available on 
PowerLink

I just tried to install the 7.6 32-bit linux (linux86) client (lgtoclnt and lgtoman) and nsrexecd wouldn't start up because of problems with some ssl library -- so early in the process it didn't even open and log in the daemon.raw file.

So, then I went back to 7.4.5.2 client and tried to install the 7.6 nmc. That one failed trying to convert language files. /sigh

Back to running the 7.4.5.2 nmc.  /sigh

I swear the land our data center is built on must be cursed.

Frank

On 11/21/09 3:51 PM, Khan, Sami wrote:

I just finished testing NMC 7.6 with NW 7.4.5.2 on a test Windows box, it does 
look like a worthwhile NMC upgrade. Thanks for the pointer Preston.

Sami

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Preston de Guise
Sent: 20 November 2009 22:16
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] NetWorker 7.6 Binaries/Installers now available on 
PowerLink

Hi Tim,

On 21/11/2009, at 08:50 , Tim Mooney wrote:

In regard to: [Networker] NetWorker 7.6 Binaries/Installers now available...:

If you're wanting to see the enhancements to monitoring while
downloading the packages and documentation for testing, you can find a
brief overview here: http://bit.ly/8G894R

I agree with you blog assessment -- this is a great reason to upgrade to
NMC 3.6, even if you wait on the actual NetWorker upgrade.

Have you, by chance, tested NMC from 7.6 with Networker 7.5.x and 7.4.x?
Any oddities that you noticed?

I don't actually recall testing with 7.4.x, but I don't see why it wouldn't 
work. Downwards compatibility is always a lot easier.

I did a number of tests though with 7.5.1 and its various patch releases though 
and never noticed any issues.

Cheers,

Preston.

--
Preston de Guise


"Enterprise Systems Backup and Recovery: A Corporate Insurance Policy":

http://www.amazon.com/Enterprise-Systems-Backup-Recovery-Corporate/dp/1420076396

http://www.enterprisesystemsbackup.com

NetWorker blog: http://nsrd.wordpress.com


To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

--
Frank Swasey                    | http://www.uvm.edu/~fcs
Sr Systems Administrator        | Always remember: You are UNIQUE,
University of Vermont           |    just like everyone else.
 "I am not young enough to know everything." - Oscar Wilde (1854-1900)


To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER