Networker

Re: [Networker] Confused about parallelism

2009-11-17 10:25:21
Subject: Re: [Networker] Confused about parallelism
From: MIchael Leone <Michael.Leone AT PHA.PHILA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:22:37 -0500
EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU> wrote on 
11/17/2009 07:19:32 AM:

> Citerar Rick Brode <rick AT BRODETRAINING DOT COM>:
> 
> > Dag Nygren wrote:
> >> fredag 13 november 2009 02:36:36 skrev  MIchael Leone:
> >>
> >>> ...
> >>> I could, of course, assign specific tape drives to specific pools, 
But I
> >>> thought for sure there was a way to do without hard-coding specific 
drives
> >>> to specific pools.
> >>>
> >> At least in 7.5.1 there is a "Max parallelism" in the pool settings 
> >>  that is supposed to do exactly that. Not quite sure in what 
> >> version  it got there though. Haven't tested it either
> > "Max parallelism" in the pool resource specifies the maximum number of
> > save sets that may be multiplexed to a volume in the pool.  It can
> > override a device's Target sessions and Max sessions.  For example, if
> > a device has "Target sessions" set to 6 and a pool has "Max
> > parallelism" set to 2, when any volume from that pool is mounted on 
the
> > device, no more than 2 save sets will be multiplexed on the volume.
> 
> Exactly. And that was the initial request :-)

That actually wasn't my initial request, however. I was concerned about 
the total number of drives a pool could use at one time, not the number of 
savesets multiplexed onto any one volume, or at any one time. 

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER