Networker

Re: [Networker] DR qeustions

2009-10-29 20:27:17
Subject: Re: [Networker] DR qeustions
From: Tim Mooney <Tim.Mooney AT NDSU DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:18:57 -0500
In regard to: [Networker] DR qeustions, Matthew Powell said (at 10:25am on...:

I have a Networker 7.4 environment with only 1 backup server. I was
curious if I set up a Storage Node would that be able to take over for
the primary if I have a hardware failure on the primary server? Or would
it be easier just to set up another backup server that points to the
same disk space? Thanks for your time.

Since no one else has responded, I'll take a stab at this.  If others
respond and contradict anything I say, they're right and I'm wrong.  ;-)

There's no easy way to promote a storage node to be a full NetWorker
server.  You would have to go through exactly the same procedure (the full
DR procedure) to get your NetWorker server back, whether you're starting
with a box that's already a storage node or you're just starting with some
random server.

The only advantages to promoting a storage node to a full server would be

- you already have most of the NetWorker bits and most (probably all) of
  the software prereqs installed.

- you have a system that has I/O connectivity to some backup media and/or
  jukebox.

There is one possible disadvantage that I can think of to promoting
your storage node: you no longer have a separate storage node.  That means
that once you've finished the DR procedure, you may (I'm not certain on
this) also need to reconfigure any client resources that were configured
to use the storage node to now use the server (even though it's the same
system, with the same hostname).  This may add some complexity that you
really don't want to have to deal with during a DR.

My preference would be to leave the storage node alone and do DR on some
other capable server, if I were in your shoes.  There are of course
clustering options you might consider and maybe they work very well with
NetWorker, but it's fairly rare to see someone post to the list with a
clustered NetWorker server config so I'm skeptical of the
clustering+NetWorker server option at this point.  I would love to see
someone give convincing evidence that it's easy and painless to set up and
manage.

Tim
--
Tim Mooney                                             Tim.Mooney AT ndsu DOT 
edu
Enterprise Computing & Infrastructure                  701-231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building                             701-231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type 
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request 
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the 
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>