Networker

Re: [Networker] Incrementals on non-indexed pools?

2009-05-14 14:56:24
Subject: Re: [Networker] Incrementals on non-indexed pools?
From: A Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 18:52:23 +0000
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:39:50PM -0400, George Sinclair wrote:
> If you turn of indexing for a pool, what happens if you run an 
> incremental, say, after you've run a full? Will it just run the 
> equivalent of another level full, etc., etc.? Ditto for a numeric?

The client doesn't see the existing indexes in a normal backup anyway,
so it has no effect.

The client just backs up files that have been added or changed since the
timestamp that the servers hands it.  

> Obviously, if this option is turned off then NW isn't going to update 
> the online client index, just the media database, so it would seem that 
> an actual incremental or numeric would not be possible because how would 
> it know what had changed since the last backup without the index 
> entries, and yet you can perform save set recovers wherein you specify 
> an incremental or numeric instance even though you're not browsing.

Timestamp of when the previous full (or other relevant backup).

-- 
Darren

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>