> Fazil Saiyed 
> Also remember that certain condition must exist for this behavior to 
> occur.
> i.e client is slow to backup , networker parallelism is high or higher.
> Tape speed is faster then data coming into networker server, therefore 
it 
> will save to memory until it's full then write it in 2 GB increment, 
this 
> type of implementation would get around show shining of  tape drives.
> HTH

FYI -- We're currently on 7.2.x (not sure of the incremental rev, since 
we're running Sun's EBS, build 494), and it still divides up Netware 
volumes (only).

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER