Re: [Networker] NDMP Schedling
2009-01-20 11:35:46
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:22:39AM +0000, Davina Treiber wrote:
> A Darren Dunham wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure what you're saying about a level 1 acting as an
>> incremental. A level 1 and an incremental are different. In a normal
>> environment, consecutive level 1 jobs will require more volume space
>> than consecutive incrementals.
>
> Not necessarily true. Although you will backup more data with a level 1
> than an incremental, you will need to keep more volumes to fulfill the
> retention requirements. If you have a monthly cycle of incrementals you
> will need to keep up to a month of extra incremental backups, since the
> incrementals depend on all the other incrementals all the way back to
> the previous full. With a monthly cycle of level 1 backups the level 1
> backups will expire at exactly the time when the retention period is
> reached, depending only on the full.
I'm not suggesting that such a scheme is better or worse than another
overall for all workloads. But with NDMP, it becomes very difficult to
do true incrs for an extended period of time even if you want to. I
have one server that I *really* want to.
I don't have any Celerra units, but I've heard that they have a true
incr if asked to do a "level 10" backup. I don't know if Networker
could ask for that via NDMP or not. Netapp filers don't have a similar
facility.
--
Darren
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|