Networker

Re: [Networker] Separate Pools for Incrementals?

2009-01-05 22:04:06
Subject: Re: [Networker] Separate Pools for Incrementals?
From: Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:01:30 -0500
> From: JGillTech <networker-forum AT BACKUPCENTRAL DOT COM>
> Reply-To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:14:42 -0500
> To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> Subject: [Networker] Separate Pools for Incrementals?
> 
> I have the standard schedule Monday - Saturday incremental, with full backups
> on Sunday.  I only have 20 clients, well within my backup window.  Both browse
> and retention are 2-months, with monthly clones created with 1-year retention.
> Any good reason to separate full and incremental backups onto different
> volumes via media pools?

Just off the top of my head, the only reason to separate full and
incremental backups into separate pools is if you wanted to send just the
full backup tapes off-site, but leave the incremental backups on-site. Based
on what you wrote, I get the feeling you are not interested in doing that.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>