Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker
2008-12-19 09:40:11
Hello,
The . files may be related Mac Finder info stored on Windows, while back i
used Mac server IP to accelerate Mac file access on Windows & that did the
same, i renamed one of the Windows file to end in . and the system just
stripped it off and i had no problem with the file.
I dont remember having any issues backing up this files either.( with
Networker versions prior to 7)
Have you run the backup with extra debug on, what are the errors ?
Thanks
Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Sent by: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
12/18/2008 08:57 PM
Please respond to
EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>; Please respond
to
Stan Horwitz <stan AT TEMPLE DOT EDU>
To
NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Other back-up products besides NetWorker
> From: "Goslin, Paul" <pgoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>
> Reply-To: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>,
"Goslin,
> Paul" <pgoslin AT CINCOM DOT COM>
> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 14:19:09 -0500
> To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker
>
> EMC does not per-say 'make' Networker - They purchased it.... And now
> own it....
>
> Being the data storage company that they are... They wanted to have the
> backup product that had the lions share of the backup market, so they
> bought the biggest player in the field: Networker.
Being a long-time NetWorker user (since version 5.2), I can say that
dealing
with EMC's people and working with the NetWorker product is a bittersweet
experience. NetWorker has definitely improved since EMC bought it. EMC's
support of NetWorker has also improved over the years. I also really
appreciate EMC's willingness to support the user group community.
NetWorker scales incredibly well and its very well suited for the largest
of
enterprises and not-so-large organizations. To say that NetWorker isn't an
Enterprise-worthy backup package is preposterous. For us, NetWorker gets
the
job done ... about 95% of the time. Its that 5% that's incredibly
annoying!
For example, we've are seeing more Windows file servers hosting files
created by Apple Mac users. I have three Windows 2003 servers with failed
backups the past few days because some Mac users are storing files on
these
servers with names that end in a period. Why Windows allows that to happen
is a mystery to me when such file names are not supposed to be supported
by
Windows. I am a long time Mac user and I can't imagine why I would ever
need
to create a file with a name that ends in a period, but I can if I want
to,
and apparently, some of my fellow Mac users want to. So, I opened up a
case
with EMC this morning to ask how I can handle such situations with the
NetWorker Windows client. Their response was that such files should be
renamed or backed up with the NetWorker for Mac OS X client. Sigh! So I
just
submitted a RFE to fix that issue.
Secondly, I have been fighting for two weeks with Windows 2008, Exchange
2007, and the NetWorker Module for Microsoft Applications to do Exchange
2007 backups in a clustered environment for a proof of concept project. I
have engaged EMC at several levels and they are actively working with me
to
get this to work, but it sure is a big time suck. I suspect this POC will
work out fine for us, but it sure is a PITA to demonstrate it.
As an aside, if I had a dime for every grammatical error and typo I have
found in material that EMC publishes, I would have very heavy pockets! I
just found a grammatical error in the legal blurb that's displayed when
one
submits an RFE via PowerLink. I am surprised that EMC doesn't have a few
technical writers to proof read stuff. Yes, I know this complaint is a nit
picky thing.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, tcassid AT kimball DOT com
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Conrad Macina
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Bruce Breidall
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Fazil Saiyed
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Joe N. Wallace
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Goslin, Paul
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Stan Horwitz
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker,
Fazil Saiyed <=
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Murphy, Brendan (DBO)
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Stan Horwitz
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Fazil Saiyed
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Stan Horwitz
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Oscar Olsson
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Stan Horwitz
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, NetWorker
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Oscar Olsson
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, Bruce Breidall
- Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker, NetWorker
|
|
|