> From: Oscar Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT SE>
> Reply-To: EMC NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>, 
> Oscar
> Olsson <spam1 AT QBRANCH DOT SE>
> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 13:12:01 +0100
> To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
> Subject: Re: [Networker] Other back-up products besides NetWorker
> 
> On 2008-12-18 20:19, Goslin, Paul revealed:
> 
> GP> I've read the advantage of Networker is that it scales better in larger
> GP> environments than other products tend to... Which is a good strength to
> GP> have in the storage business.
> 
> My experience is that up to the 7.3 release train, it scaled pretty well.
> However, we have seen load increases and other scalability problems with
> release 7.3, mostly related to nsrjobd and its database. So in essence,
> 7.2 scales better than 7.3 in this sense. These problems might have been
> fixed recently, but I doubt it. :)

Actually, nsrjobd has improved in each of the 7.4 updates. Take a look at
the release notes for the details.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER