Re: [Networker] Networker and Data Domain
2008-05-12 14:21:18
Thanks David. I can get a steep discount on the price being an EDU
site. (I know, it's not fair, but we are also poor, so it evens out.)
Otherwise that would be a killer out of the gate. The thing that I'm
most worried about is the CPU intensive bit. Some of our clients are
quite old and may not have the juice to run Avamar. Also sorry to hear
you can't stage to tape. That also is a problem for our off site
scheme. I guess EMC wants you to buy two of everything. A bit of a racket.
Regards,
Jon
David Dulek wrote:
I have just completed a POC for Avamar.
You thought that the Data Domain was expensive get a price on Avamar. :)
In order to do the 15 TB capacity that I have on my 580, I would have to buy
9x2U servers (with 6x1TB drives, that is 8 x 2T servers with a hot spare
server) and a 1U server (control station). If I want to replicate to the
other DC, double that. Now add the EMC software licensing. :)
It seems to work including the integration into the NetWorker tools and it is
very easy to setup within NetWorker.
Negatives:
No module support.
No way to do D2D2T without going to a different disk target. (You have to
configure two sets of backups. One for Avamar and disk only and one for disk
that will go to tape.)
Although the client licensing on the Avamar has gone away you still have to
pay for the NetWorker Client license.
Very CPU intensive.
/nsr has to be big enough on all clients to save the "caches". ( I ran "/"
out of space on one of the test linux clients. )
Positives:
Impressive compress and network savings.
Since I already have a Data Domain infrastructure to handle the modules
backups, this is something I am still considering.
I am not sure if I am OK with running two backups per client per day that I
want on tape and the Avamar grid.
On Saturday 10 May 2008, Jonathan Loran wrote:
Hi Conrad and list:
We investigated Data Domain, and we did a test of a DD200 when it first
came out, 3 or so years back. Was very impressed with the speed and
somewhat impressed with the dedupe ratio. However, it was way to
expensive for our UC budget.
More to my point: we are interested in investigating Avamar, which is
integrated into Networker 7.4.2. It has in interesting implementation
where the data duplication is discovered on the client side, such that
the Avamar server keeps a hash of stored checksums, and the client
queries the server as to whether the data block already exists on the
server. If not, the data is sent with the checksum, if so, only the
next checksum needs to be sent. This has the benefit of potentially
dramatically reducing network traffic.
I'm wondering if anyone on the list has experience with EMC Avamar? It
would be great to hear some non-biased reviews before I proceed.
Thanks,
Jon
Macina, Conrad wrote:
Hi, Kevin,
Leaving aside for at least a moment the discussion of vendors and spam,
I'm very interested in what you receive from your query about Data
Domain and possibly other dedupe vendors. I suspect other list members
will be as well. When you're done with your investigation, I wonder if
you could you please post a summary of your findings to the list?
One finding I'm particularly interested in: is it properly spelled
"dedupe" or "dedup"? :^)
Thanks!
Conrad Macina
Pfizer, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Malone [mailto:kcmalone AT SALISBURY DOT EDU]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2008 2:01 PM
Subject: Networker and Data Domain
If there is anyone out there who is using a Data Domain dedupe solution
with Networker and would be willing to have a conversation (good or bad)
about it with me, I would be appreciative.
We are looking at dedupe solutions and I am not endorsing any at this
point, but that is one that we have come across.
You can send me a private e-mail so as not to clog up the listserv.
Thanks,
Kevin
Kevin Malone
Network Administrator
Salisbury University
Information Technology FH297
kcmalone AT salisbury DOT edu
410-543-6298
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
--
- _____/ _____/ / - Jonathan Loran - -
- / / / IT Manager -
- _____ / _____ / / Space Sciences Laboratory, UC Berkeley
- / / / (510) 643-5146 jloran AT ssl.berkeley DOT edu
- ______/ ______/ ______/ AST:7731^29u18e3
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|