Networker

Re: [Networker] VSS on Windows

2008-04-23 08:28:14
Subject: Re: [Networker] VSS on Windows
From: James Pratt <jpratt AT NORWICH DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 08:17:21 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
> On Behalf Of Davina Treiber
> Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 4:14 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: Re: [Networker] VSS on Windows
> 
> James Pratt wrote:
> 
> > Sorry, I'm still fairly new to NW, so this may be a dumb question,
> but
> > does anyone know if there are any additional licensing issues/things
> to
> > be aware of moving forward on this VSS stuff with 2008 server? Does
> > EMC/NW require any special license for VSS etc ?
> >
> > So, I've found this thread kind of confusing and unclear - maybe
it's
> > just me as I don't know much of windoze VSS yet, I don't know..
> 
> I am not sure either exactly what VSS is or how it works, again
because
> I am a Unix bod and am a bit reluctant to get into Windows concepts
> such
> as VSS and AD.
> 
> However there is a new NetWorker module called something like
NetWorker
> module for Microsoft applications - and this does require a licence.
> This is touted as a replacement for all the other Microsoft modules
> such
> as SQL and Exchange, although if VSS is basically an Open File Manager
> then I don't see how it can make a consistent backup of a database.
> 
> If it is just an OFM, then it looks to be a solution to a long
standing
> problem that other OSes don't have. (Has anyone got a copy of QEMM for
> Vista BTW?  ;-)  )
> 
> Or is it more than an OFM and more of a snapshot tool? Even if it
> provides snapshotting it would still require a way of properly
> quiesceing any databases before backing them up.
> 
> So - I am still as confused as I was at the start of this thread.
> Perhaps it is because I have an underlying unwillingness to understand
> Windows. I have been hoping for many years that Windows would just go
> away but I suspect I may be a little optimistic about this.

Thanks Davina. 

So, here is the ultimate *list-test* - Can *anyone* from EMC/Legeto on
the list please clear this up a bit? Now it's even more confused to me -
"nmm" replacing exch nm and sql nm? .. are the other modules eventually
going away?

Thanks again
Jamie

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER