Re: [Networker] Compression on Win2003 servers question
2008-02-25 13:08:39
In my experience this mostly depends upon what it is you are backing up. In my
world SQL backup containers compress 90% and thus are handled wonderfully by
the compress asm. However my file servers which have hundreds of thousands of
small files do not respond all that well to the compress asm. What comprises
that 570G?
I'm pretty sure there is no all or nothing requirement for compression.
I think someone suggested in the past testing with bigasm to understand
hardware compression/compress asm interactions under a specific set of hardware.
--Shawn
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of MIchael Leone
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 11:46 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Compression on Win2003 servers question
I have a Win2003 server, NW 7.4 SP1, using an HP SDLT autoloader. Total size of
backup is about 600G (589G, according to mminfo). We'd like to do a full backup
every day. However, I seem to be averaging 4 tapes (3 full tapes, and 25% used
on the last) every day. Now, an SDLT tape is 160G native, up to 320G
compressed, so 600G would need 4 tapes native (3 and
3/4 or so, according to the math).
IOW, it doesn't appear as if compression is being used, or just barely used. I
see nowhere in NW how to turn on hardware compression on the autochanger. Am I
just missing it?
I did change to using the "NT with compression" directive, which didn't seem to
affect the output; I am still getting 3.25 tapes per day used.
My question: I am backing up 3 servers, 2 of which were set to use the
compression directive, and 1 was not (this last server is very small, and
doesn't significantly add to the total). Do all group members need to use the
same compression directive, else NW won't compress? It shouldn't be a problem
to make all 3 servers use the compression directive, but I thought I could use
it only on the server that needs it (one server accounts for about 570G of the
590G total).
Thanks
--
Michael Leone
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|