Networker

Re: [Networker] VTL or disk cabinet backup

2007-11-06 08:40:35
Subject: Re: [Networker] VTL or disk cabinet backup
From: Teresa Biehler <tpbsys AT RIT DOT EDU>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2007 05:49:17 -0500
Ok, a specific LUN cannot be shared, but you can create two different
LUNs and assign them to two different servers.  So, you can share the
pool of space between two different servers.  

-T

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Curtis Preston
Sent: Monday, November 05, 2007 6:35 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] VTL or disk cabinet backup


OO>And why is handling RAID volumes a high cost?

It's the difficulty in creating MULTIPLE RAID volumes, deciding how big
each of them should be, and assigning them to servers.  You will always
have LUNs that are too big and/or too small, creating waste and
management issues, respectively.  You also (today) can't share those
volumes between multiple backup servers.  A VTL can be shared between
multiple servers.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER