Networker

Re: [Networker] Networker 7.3.3 Restores Slow

2007-08-22 06:06:52
Subject: Re: [Networker] Networker 7.3.3 Restores Slow
From: "Faidherbe, Thierry" <Thierry.Faidherbe AT HP DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:51:36 -0000
A core info is missing : how did you do the recover ?
using ssid recover or browsing client file index ?

Another important think to take care of is tape multiplexing
during backup : How more multiplexed is the tape block, how 
more tape blocks have to be processed for extracting data.
In other words, Backup Rule #1 : fast backup, slow recover. 

You also have a look at which device mounted the volume for
recovery. Maybe did you recover across the lan ....

Th

Kind regards - Bien cordialement - Vriendelijke groeten,

Thierry FAIDHERBE

HP Services - Storage Division
Tru64 Unix and Legato Enterprise Backup Solutions Consultant
                                  
 *********       *********  HEWLETT - PACKARD SPRL/BVBA
 *******    h      *******  Hermeslaan, 1a
 ******    h        ******  B-1831 Diegem 
 *****    hhhh  pppp *****  BELGIUM
 *****   h  h  p  p  *****     
 *****  h  h  pppp   *****  Phone :    +32 (0)2  / 729.85.42  
 ******      p      ******  Mobile :   +32 (0)498/  94.60.85  
 *******    p      *******  Fax :      +32 (0)2  / 729.88.30 
 *********       *********  Email/MSN : thierry.faidherbe(at)hp.com     
                                  Internet  : http://www.hp.com/
      I  N  V  E  N  T           
                                
      Enterprise number 0402.220.594  RPM/RPR Brussels           

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On 
Behalf Of Randy Doering
Sent: mercredi 22 août 2007 2:09
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Networker 7.3.3 Restores Slow

Greetings, In the past I've used Networker backups to restore to a new file 
system for migration reasons. Helps to stay off of the current one plus 
tested the backup (and restore) capabilities. I've done this for the past 
couple of years and was pleased with the performance of the restore 
operations (both directed recover and saveset recover).

About 2 weeks ago, I made a fresh full backup of a 2TB file system (after 
splitting a 4.7TB into 2 chunks).

Last week I started the restore to some new space of this 2TB and it has 
been taking "forever" to get the data off of the tapes.

When I did the backup, I was at 7.3.2 Junbo (399). A couple of weeks ago, I 
upgrade to 7.3.3.

Side Note: Last year when I started these type of migrations and tried the 
Linux "cp -a source-dir target-dir/." I would get the "max arguement" error 
message which is why I went to the NW restore option. Now the "cp -a" is 
working on these directories with 100K - 150K small files in them.

So as anyone done any massive restores with 7.3.3 and noticed any dramatic 
performance hits?

Thanks,
Randy
 

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>