My experience may be dated...
I last worked for The Pentagon in January/February. But during that time
phone support was incredible. The phone support folks would rotate and
forward my call around until we had a SME (subject matter expert) to
discuss my issues with me.
I can tell you I called in a request for help from HERE on the NDMP
issue on Thursday and received my answer today. /shrug I don't know if
they have a backlog or what the deal is... I am still learning the
system here, it could be MY ISSUE at this point, not sure yet.
POWERLINK is another story
It has been a horrible DEBACLE, but... To give them credit it is
way ahead NOW of where I left it in February. The problem I have is it
would appear instead of buying an industrial strength support solution,
that EMC is allowing their customers to beta test their support
solution.
EMC in buying legato has become this big monster that can not turn on a
dime. It turns on oh... Say a dollar & 87 cents. <grin>
Use Powerlink when you can to document the issues, if you don't have
time to wait use the toll free #...
OH and P.S.
Dearest High Muckity-Muck @ EMC SUPPORT,
Please go get DEBBIE DUNN and put her BACK in Support... I miss her
Techno-therapy! Truly one of the best tech support folks I have ever
worked with. Oh and the next time you decide to let someone of her
caliber leave your team, do us a favor and develop a PATCH that we can
wear to get over our addiction to great service. <grin> (Yeah-yeah, for
the rest of the support team you're good too, just miss Deb!)
Semper Fidelis et paratus, of course if I was paratus I wouldn't need
this list!
Eddie Albert aka THE NETWORKER KID!
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Clark, Patti
Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 10:07 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Is support of networker with emc getting better
or worse?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion
> [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On Behalf Of mark wragge
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2007 6:50 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] Is support of networker with emc getting
> better or worse?
>
> I would like to get some feedback from others regarding the
> current quality of networker support from EMC. Do you find it
> is getting better or worse?
> Over the past months i have used powerlink to log a number
> of support calls that have been responded to once and then no
> response. Two of the calls in particular i have requested an
> update through powerlink on a daily basis (as a sort of
> survey) and there was never one response from an engineer. In
> one case i received a phone call from an enginner 3 weeks
> after the initial response during which time i had resolved
> the case through this website.
>
> In my experience over te past 6 monhts there is only one
> way to get a response from support and that is by logging the
> case as severity 1. But then as soon as the enginner drops it
> to severity 2 there is no response - and I mean NO response.
>
> Customers are paying money for licenses that do not work (
> we have 2 incidense of this at the moment for exchange and MS
> vclusters) and they are paying for support of these licesnes
> and EMC support are doing nothing about it.
>
> Is the problem here powerlink? does it actually register my
> updates with the support team or are they working from
> powerlink at all?
>
> Other experiences appreciated!
>
In a nutshell, my experiences with EMC support has been awful. The only
reason to use them is to have the PowerLink access to the documentation
and the software updates. Period.
Phone support is always pleasant, they make promises, don't always open
a ticket (no ticket, no trail, no resolution).
Web support is non-existant. I open tickets, they sit for a while and
then they are closed. No information, no resolution, no contact, just
closed.
EMC held 2 webinars about PowerLink in June where they dog and ponied
the features. Along with the host, there were several EMC attendees who
were there for questions. I asked a question about getting my PowerLink
account fixed. The only answer I received was from the one EMC attendee
who was hiding behind a screen name. Again, promises were made online
and that was the end of it. No contact, no resolution.
I shudder to think what would happen if I had an unresolved technical
issue that was a show stopper. It's bad enough that nsrexecd dies with
a core dump at least monthly, sometimes more often without explanation.
v7.3.2 Jumbo_1 on RHEL4.
I become green with envy when I hear from folks on this list who have
assigned teams and receive stellar technical support. I assume there is
a price point for that type of support.
This list is a lifesaver!
Patti Clark
Unix System Administrator - RHCT
Office of Scientific and Technical Information
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
--------------------------------------------------------
This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unless specifically indicated,
this message is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of any investment
products or other financial product or service, an official confirmation of any
transaction, or an official statement of Merrill Lynch. Subject to applicable
law, Merrill Lynch may monitor, review and retain e-communications (EC)
traveling through its networks/systems. The laws of the country of each
sender/recipient may impact the handling of EC, and EC may be archived,
supervised and produced in countries other than the country in which you are
located. This message cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. This
message is subject to terms available at the following link:
http://www.ml.com/e-communications_terms/. By messaging with Merrill Lynch you
consent to the foregoing.
--------------------------------------------------------
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
