On Apr 24, 2007, at 4:04 PM, George Sinclair wrote:
Excellent point, but if that 10 GB is being compressed down to say
5 GB via the 'compressed' option, for example, then you're only
using 5 GB of tape, but if your rman script isn't using the
'compressed' option, and you're sending all 10 GB to the drive then
the drive is still gonna use hardware compression, so how do I
determine which method actually used less tape? Maybe it's a toss up?
If you are using hardware compression, then using software
compression on top of it (for any kind of data, Oracle or other) will
give rise to the possibility that the data might actually take up
more space on your tapes, not less. Usually, hardware compression is
the way to go and software compression should be used only in a
narrow set of circumstances such as a situation where a client has a
lot of compressible data and a slow network pipe.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|