> The tape is in the media DB, barcode matches, it is the VOLID that is
> different between what is on the tape and in the media DB, sorry for the
> wrong information

And this is true prior to the relabel?  I don't know any way to rewrite
a tape and keep the information on it, so I'm assuming that this is an
issue in the database.

That shouldn't cause a duplicate label though.

Before the relabel, there should be 1 tape in the database with that
volume name.  The relabel should grab that name from the tape, then
delete that volume from the database.  Then it will try to create a new
tape with that name.

Either the volume name on the tape is read wrong, the media database
isn't deleting that volume name properly, or the wrong name is sent as
the new tape.

Does that make sense?  Can you tell which of those might be happening?

-- 
Darren Dunham                                           ddunham AT taos DOT com
Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER