Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question
2007-03-07 16:29:10
> > Ah, got it. If I can't mix the All saveset, I do need
> another instance.
>
> So if you use 'All' in the other instance, it won't know
> anything about this one and will back up E:\ as well. You'd
> need a directive if you didn't want that to happen.
Yes,
Client Instance #1 has saveset All, w/directive to Skip the whole E:\
drive.
Client Instance #2 only has explicit folders on the skipped drive, no
All saveset.
I think I got that right.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Werth, Dave
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Wood, R A (Bob)
- Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Darren Dunham
- [Networker] disk parallelism question, Dewhirst, Rob
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question, Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question, Dewhirst, Rob
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question, Darren Dunham
- Re: [Networker] disk parallelism question,
Dewhirst, Rob <=
Re: [Networker] Networker Exclude List, Dave Mussulman
|
|
|