It is all related to the many problems we have had with our
configuration, and with the amount of hands in the pot, it's been
difficult to get our arms around it.
It was not a contractor that came onsite. After researching it further,
it seems they created a new pool called yearly (not sure how creating a
new pool is helping in the optimizing), it may be part of "naming
standards" (Obviously theirs not mine).
Yes, they do/did tout 7.3.2 as the best thing ever, but so far from what
I have ready. . .(fill in the blanks).
-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of Albert Eddie Contractor AFRPA CIO/IT
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:22 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Pool question
Was it an EMC employee who came on-site or a contractor? When we
contemplated hiring emc to come on site, they intended to send a
contractor so we cancelled the work request and did it ourselves. Since
you paid EMC to optimize back-ups for you; can you hold their feet to
the fire and ask that question of them? Surely they would not be adverse
to answering that question for you.
Was optimizing on 7.2 your org's decision or EMC's? I ask this because
when I was talking to support discussing my windows 2003 environment,
you could almost envision the tech standing on the desk talking to me
"with enthusiasm" (read this as talking loudly bordering on screaming)
telling me to migrate to 7.3.2 NOW-NOW-NOW! I am working networker
issues from that migration now. The first one we thought went well, but
we are having issues.
By issues I mean corrupt indices and such. Not my ideal thought of a
flawless migration. /ALE
> -----Original Message-----
> From: EMC NetWorker discussion
> [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On Behalf Of Howard, Patrick
> Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 8:21 AM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] Pool question
>
> Recently we had a project whereby we hired EMC to come onsite to do a
> software assessment to make sure Legato is "optimized".
>
> In doing their first phase they, consolidated some of my pools down.
> Here is what was done:
>
> I had a pool called Exchange Offsite that had a policy of 7 year
> retention. I did this to make sure that nothing was on the tape other
> than "exchange offsite". I could then sort my volumes tab easily and
> see Exchange Offsites and take them out and send them offsite. I
> could also change their location as Offsite for 7 years, all very
> easily.
>
> EMC got rid of my Exchange Offsite pool and put it to DAILY pool. The
> Client still has the 7 year policy for Exchange, but my question is:
>
> Will I get DAILY pool backups that have 2 week retentions, combined
> with Exchange data that has 7 year? Since most of my backups are now
> going to DAILY pool.
>
> Windows 2003
> Legato 7.2
>
>
> <http://www.anntaylor.com/>
>
> Patrick S. Howard
> Ann Taylor
> 476 Wheelers Farm Road
> Milford, CT 06460
> (203) 283-8772 direct
> (646) 660-0426 mobile
> patrick_howard AT anntaylor DOT com
> www.anntaylor.com <http://www.anntaylor.com/>
>
>
>
> **************************************************************
> *********************
> The information in this email (including any attachments) is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this e-mail by
> anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure,
> copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it (including any attachments) is prohibited and
> may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply
> to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the
> message, all attachments, and any copies thereof from your system and
> destroy any printout thereof.
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> The information in this email (including any attachments) is
> confidential and may be legally privileged. Access to this e-mail by
> anyone other than the intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are
> not the intended recipient of this message, any review, disclosure,
> copying, distribution, retention, or any action taken or omitted to be
> taken in reliance on it (including any attachments) is prohibited and
> may be unlawful. If you are not the intended recipient, please reply
> to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and delete the
> message, all attachments, and any copies thereof from your system and
> destroy any printout thereof.
>
> To sign off this list, send email to
> listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type "signoff networker" in the body
> of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if
> you have any problems with this list. You can access the archives at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
>
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or via RSS at
http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
***********************************************************************************
The information in this email (including any attachments) is confidential and
may be legally privileged. Access to this e-mail by anyone other than the
intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it (including any
attachments) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and
delete the message, all attachments, and any copies thereof from your system
and destroy any printout thereof.
______________________________________________________________________
The information in this email (including any attachments) is confidential and
may be legally privileged. Access to this e-mail by anyone other than the
intended addressee is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient of
this message, any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, retention, or any
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it (including any
attachments) is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you are not the intended
recipient, please reply to or forward a copy of this message to the sender and
delete the message, all attachments, and any copies thereof from your system
and destroy any printout thereof.
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
