Networker

Re: [Networker] Default Tape Pool for Storage Node

2006-10-19 19:55:18
Subject: Re: [Networker] Default Tape Pool for Storage Node
From: Peter Viertel <Peter.Viertel AT MACQUARIE DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 09:53:07 +1000
In a nutshell..   Yes.

The site a > B  and B > A setup is exactly what we do.


-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT listserv.temple DOT edu] On
Behalf Of Andrew Dietz
Sent: Friday, 20 October 2006 6:40 AM
To: NETWORKER AT listserv.temple DOT edu
Subject: [Networker] Default Tape Pool for Storage Node

We have recently acquired a StorageTek SL500 tape library from Sun along

with a Sun Fire T2000 server and licences for Sun StorEdge EBS (a.k.a. 
Legato Networker) 7.3 to serve as our next-generation enterprise backup 
system. It has worked very well so far -- in fact so much so that we 
have been faced with the opportunity to acquire yet another SL500 tape 
library to serve as a storage node at a separate location. The idea 
would be to backup servers from location A to tape library in location B

and backup servers from location B to tape library in location A -- all 
in an effort to satisfy off-site backup storage requirements without 
actually handling tapes (we are in a large metropolitan college campus).

Another potentially important nugget of information is that we do not 
use custom tape pools; all servers are backed up to the 'Default' pool. 
We feared that with only 4 tape drives in the library and multiple tape 
pools, the drives may not get full utilization when a group owned by a 
large pool that could use all 4 drives at once would be limited to a 
lesser number of concurrent drives because another group from a smaller 
pool was currently tying up one or more drives. Likewise, we feared that

such group owned by a larger pool might even be delayed from starting by

the group from the smaller pool. Groups were created based on the start 
time for that group (i.e., 1800, 1830, etc).

My question is this: Will a storage node be able to use the same 
'Default' tape pool as the "master" server, assuming, of course, that we

set the appropriate storage node affinity to determine which tape 
library receives each client's data?

TIA,
Andrew Dietz

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER


NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may contain copyright 
material of Macquarie Bank or third parties. If you are not the intended 
recipient of this email you should not read, print, re-transmit, store or act 
in reliance on this e-mail or any attachments, and should destroy all copies of 
them. Macquarie Bank does not guarantee the integrity of any emails or any 
attached files. The views or opinions expressed are the author's own and may 
not reflect the views or opinions of Macquarie Bank.

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>