Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me
2006-06-22 11:20:22
Stan Horwitz wrote:
> Does anyone on this list have any positive things to say about 7.3.1?
Sure -- it's better than 7.3. :)
At least in my case, it no longer takes 10 minutes every time we operate
the library load port. Backups seem to be faster than 7.3. Some of the
other assorted minor bugs seem to be fixed. It also fixed a couple of
bugs we had in 7.2.1.
On the other hand, nsrmmdbd still hangs periodicly, taking out the
entire server. Parallellism is affecting entire clients, not just
savegroups (two savegroups on the same client each with parellelism of
"n" will only run n savegroups, not n*2). Occasionally it decides to
not mount and relabel tapes. I can't restore from archives with
nsrretrieve, I have to use scanner and uasm.
So, it's better than 7.3, but still not as good as 7.2.1.
--
Dan Rich <drich AT pdi DOT com>
PDI Dreamworks | "Step up to red alert!" "Are you sure, sir?
(650)562-9018 | It means changing the bulb in the sign..."
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me, Albert Eddie Contractor AFRPA CIO/IT
- Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me, Thomas, Tim
- Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me, Thomas, Tim
- Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me, Thomas, Tim
- Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me, Albert Eddie Contractor AFRPA CIO/IT
- Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me, Thomas, Tim
- Re: [Networker] 7.3.1 not recommended by me, Rohrich, James
|
|
|