|
Re: [Networker] Some questions on upgrading
2005-11-09 11:58:49
On Nov 9, 2005, at 8:28 AM, George Sinclair wrote:
If in fact the tape format is not endian dependent then it still
seems that if you back up the indexes to tape from the Solaris box,
using something like 'savegroup -o groupname', and then use 'nsrck
-L7' to recover them to the Linux box they would now be on disk,
not tape, and maybe the NetWorker version on Linux might then read
the indexes differently since the byte order is different, i.e.
Linux is little endian and Solaris is big endian. Wouldn't this
still be a problem?
Is NetWorker endian sensitive? Does it care? A lot of applications
don't care about the byte order, but some do. I can't get a clear
answer from Legato on this.
Hi,
The tape format is independent of byte order, as are client indexes.
The media index is still stored in a binary db form and is therefore
byte order sensitive.
Don't forget about uasm. Think of it like tar, but it runs the same
asm's as the save command and emits byte-order independent save
streams to stdout, which can be saved in a file and read by a uasm on
another machine. I'm just sayin' ...
Byron
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
|
|
