Networker

Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products

2005-10-31 12:13:05
Subject: Re: [Networker] Compare Netoworker to other backup products
From: Darren Dunham <ddunham AT TAOS DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 08:09:42 -0800
> > No, spanning tree, trunk auto negotiation mode, PoE negotiation etc
> does not block the negotiation in any way. And no, auto > > negotiation
> is not about listening for traffic, both parties present a list of which
> mode they can operate in.
> 
> There is NO negotation. Read the Cisco docs and RFCs. Only with gigabit
> is there an actual negotiation of protocols. When "auto" is set at
> 100MB, it's a educated guess, not a protocol or negotation. Etherchannel
> and trunking can interfere with the auto negotation, read the Cisco
> "Best Practices" to understand why the recommend "set port host" when
> doing "auto".

It may not work every time, but it's not an educated guess.  There's a
protocol for exchanging the abilities of each side.  

Here's a couple of links that explain the protocol.

http://www.ethermanage.com/ethernet/pdf/dell-auto-neg.pdf
http://www.scyld.com/NWay.html

-- 
Darren Dunham                                           ddunham AT taos DOT com
Senior Technical Consultant         TAOS            http://www.taos.com/
Got some Dr Pepper?                           San Francisco, CA bay area
         < This line left intentionally blank to confuse you. >

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu 
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER