Re: [Networker] advance file type question
2005-09-30 09:31:38
I have a solaris 8 system with networker 7.1.3 using advance file disk
devices... I have a 7 GB single saveset...
/backup8/91/35:
total 14035696
drwx--x--- 3 root other 96 Sep 28 04:06 .
drwx--x--- 7 root other 96 Sep 28 04:06 ..
-rw-r----- 1 root other 7186268152 Sep 28 05:33
8ddef9d4-00000006-623a5d03-433a5d03-079f0000-0aecbe38
drwx--x--- 2 root other 96 Sep 28 05:33 notes
Terrence R. Haupt
SR UNIX Systems Administrator
WIN, Technology Engineering
Abbott Laboratories
Ph: 847-938-2375 Cell: 847-878-1057
Text MSG 8478781057 AT messaging.nextel DOT com
Nextel Direct Connect 111*4737*123
terrence.haupt AT abbott DOT com
Tim Mooney <mooney AT DOGBERT.CC.NDSU.NODAK DOT EDU>
Sent by: Legato NetWorker discussion <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
09/29/2005 05:25 PM
Please respond to Legato NetWorker discussion; Please respond to Tim
Mooney
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
cc:
Subject: Re: [Networker] advance file type question
In regard to: Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Davina
Treiber...:
> Teresa Biehler wrote:
>> This article is relevant for clients running an old version of the
>> client (v5.x). I'm wondering about a limit on the size of save sets
>> written to an advanced file type device on Solaris 9 with v7.1.3. Is
>> Legato "large file aware"?
>
> Yes Legato is large file aware, the 2GB save set limitation is ancient
> history.
Well, yes and no. Remember that some platforms are still supported with
clients that are based on pre-V6 code. It doesn't matter if you're using
a 7.1.3 or 7.2.1 server if your client software is still pre-V6. That
was the case for NetWare until just a few weeks ago, when a true V7 client
was released for that platform. There may be other platforms that have
the same limitations.
You're right, though, that whether savesets can be larger than 2 GB (or
whether they're "chunked" into continuation savesets, as was done with
pre-V6 clients) or not has nothing to do with Teresa's question.
I don't have any experience yet with advanced file type devices, but I
would be pretty shocked if NetWorker on Solaris 9 (whether or not its
the 64 bit server) couldn't use adv_file devices in the TB size range.
Interestingly enough, when writing to tape, NetWorker never makes a single
file *on tape* larger than 2 GB. If you have a saveset that consists of
one file that's 5 GB in size, when NetWorker writes it to tape it will
have one saveset id but (at least) three file numbers (mediafile, in
mminfo parlance) on tape. I don't know if it does the same thing when
writing to an adv_file devices. I wouldn't be surprised if it did.
> It seems the other responder to your question is feeding you
> nonsense.
Hopefully I'm not making the situation worse. :-)
Tim
--
Tim Mooney mooney AT dogbert.cc.ndsu.NoDak DOT edu
Information Technology Services (701) 231-1076 (Voice)
Room 242-J6, IACC Building (701) 231-8541 (Fax)
North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58105-5164
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type
"signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the
body of the email. Please write to networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu
if you have any problems
wit this list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Rehal,Amrit
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Teresa Biehler
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Rehal,Amrit
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Peter Viertel
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Terry Lemons
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, T. S. Kimball
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Peter Viertel
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question,
Terrence R Haupt <=
- Re: [Networker] advance file type question, Terrence R Haupt
|
|
|