Networker

Re: [Networker] Slowness of backups

2005-07-20 08:21:03
Subject: Re: [Networker] Slowness of backups
From: Matthew Huff <mhuff AT OX DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:17:08 -0400
Are you running the latest Emulex driver? Make sure you are using the
latest driver and firmware, and especially using the Emulex EMC driver.
Once you have that done, use the HBAnywhere to setup the EMC parameters
(The release notes should show you how)

http://www.emulex.com/ts/docoem/framemc.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: Meyerowitz, Raphael [mailto:Raph AT netinfosystems DOT net] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:08 AM
To: Legato NetWorker discussion; Matthew Huff
Subject: RE: [Networker] Slowness of backups

Emuex 10000-E and mcdata switches.  Yeah Navi agent is installed and
also access logix. Switches are zoned and there is only one HBA in the
server.

-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
On Behalf Of Matthew Huff
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 11:06 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Slowness of backups

What type of HBA cards and what type of SAN switch do you have? Are you
running access-logix in Navisphere? Are the switches zoned? what speed
are the fibre hba's running at? 

-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
On Behalf Of Raph
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2005 10:52 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Slowness of backups

Hi,

Here is my problem.  I have a Clariion CX500 connected to a Windows 2003
server that has a 2Tb filesystem.  I have 2 x LTO3 fiber drives that are
also directly connected to the windows server via the SAN.  The windows
server does not have anti virus installed or any third party apps.  When
I run a test backup on the C: of the server I get over 60MB/S
throughput.
When I run a backup on the E: (which is SAN attached) I only get 25
MB/s.
The parallelism is set to 16 and 8 on each drive.  If someone knows why
I am only getting 25 MB/S and how I can increases this performance
please let me know.  These a flat files that are being backed up that
have no i/o on the them at the time of the tests.


Thanks

Raph

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also
view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list should
be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also
view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list should
be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>