Re: [Networker] Legato claims too many clients?
2005-07-14 16:07:37
Very interesting (never thought to try nsrlic). After doing what Anuj
recommended, I show 9 licenses being used and 1 remaining - one of the
servers is not being shown as "Connected" - and it wasn't the one that
failed last night. I'm not sure why it doesn't show up.
If I add "-v", I get a "Defined Clients" section as well, which only has
three systems listed, including the one that failed last night, and the
one that's missing.
I checked the client configuration, and it says "Enabler in use: No" for
both the Filesystem and Exchange entries.
Browning, David wrote:
Brian,
Did you run the nsrlic command? It will tell you the exact names of the
clients that are using the 10 licenses.
Nsrlic -s (server name)
David M. Browning Jr.
LSUHSC Enterprise Network Operations/Help Desk
(504) 568-4364 - Direct
(504) 914-7550 - Cell
-----Original Message-----
From: Legato NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU]
On
Behalf Of Brian O'Neill
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 6:18 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] Legato claims too many clients?
OK, I have a 7.1.2 Network Edition server with the standard 10 client
licenses.
Yesterday and today the system seems to have decided that there are too
many clients, even though I haven't changed anything:
* server1.foo.com:C:\ save: RAP error: Unable to grant SERVER
(UNIVERSAL) CLIENT license to client server1.foo.com: Too many clients.
Maximum is 10
* server1.foo.com:C:\ save: Cannot open save session with nsrhost
It was a different host on the two days that failed.
I have exactly 10 hosts defined as clients, including the server itself.
One host is not assigned to any group, as we are no longer backing it
up, and I took a second one off of groups yesterday.
Four of the hosts are Windows/Exchange, so there are two entries each,
but with the same hostname. My understanding was this would only count once.
Any ideas why suddenly it has decided there are too many hosts?
-Brian
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|