Networker

Re: [Networker] Legato Server on Linux

2005-06-27 15:33:58
Subject: Re: [Networker] Legato Server on Linux
From: Librado Pamintuan <lpamintuan AT REGINA DOT CA>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:29:49 -0400
Good afternoon George,

We are currently experiencing restore problems with the message 'cannot
read record'could this be caused by not having the /etc/st.conf file?

We are currently on Legato v7.1.3 on Red HAT ES3 and using an ADIC Scalar
100 with 2x LTO-2 tape drives.

I found a solution from Legato web support, but not sure if it's the same
content at its configured for SDLT.

thanks in advance,
Librado


On Mon, 10 Mar 2003 12:04:16 -0500, George Sinclair
<George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV> wrote:

>We are running a Storagetek L80 LTO tape library under Redhat Linux. We
>have learned the following two painful lessons:
>
>1. Make certain you have a proper /etc/st.conf file. Failure to
>configure this file properly or not having one at all will make life
>very uncomfortable for you when you go to recover data. You will see
>"tape positioning by record disabled" messages, and NetWorker will take
>forever to get itself to the right spot on the tape to begin the
>recover. So, for example, a recover that might take one hour to get the
>data and maybe 1 minute to get to the right spot to begin the recover
>will now take one hour to get to the right spot plus another hour or so
>to recover the data. We also observed extremely slow recover times once
>the recovery actually started. So learn the easy way and set up the
>st.conf file before you start any backups.
>
>2. Make certain you have the right SCSI cables. There is no way to just
>look at a SCSI cable and know for certain that it's the right type. Case
>in point, we had what we were told were LVD cables. They plugged in just
>dandy and had all the right connectors, but in time, we started
>experiencing a lot of SCSI problems. It got to the point where every
>morning I would come in to find one of two type of error messages
>appearing on a given LTO device: "read open error: Invalid argument", or
>"read open error device or resource busy". These cables looked perfectly
>fine. They had only one part number located on them, no other wording or
>print. It turns out that Storagetek had given us the wrong cables!!!!!
>They replaced them, including the cables on the library, not just those
>going to the server. I should note that the cables that were replaced on
>just the library are now flat ribbon cables, not round cables. The new
>ones connecting the library to the server are round ones, just like
>before, but they have wording printed on them, but nothing about LVD.
>Anyway, after replacing these cables  our problems went away. The moral
>of the story is that you can use the wrong cables and still have
>everything run just fine for a while, BUT sooner or later, you will
>start to see errors. So don't think that just because you're not seeing
>errors that you have the right type of cables. Check the part numbers!
>
>One thing I don't like about the L80 is the fact that they offer no way
>to move tapes around in the library without opening the door or using
>your backup software. The problem, of course, is that you can't use
>NetWorker to move a tape into a drive without mounting it. So, if we're
>having problems, and I want to do some testing using something like 'mt'
>or 'tar' or some such thing, and I want to load a non-NetWorker (blank)
>tape into the drive, I can't mount it using NetWorker. I have to open
>the frikin' door up! Now you can buy a package that apparently runs over
>the WEB and uses the ip address of the library, and it's sold by
>Storagetek, but I think it's ridiculous t hat they don't build the
>capability into the GUI panel on the front like Quauntum/ATL does with
>their P1000 libraries. Now I have to go and buy some software package to
>do that. Sheesh! When I called Storagetek about this they asked me why I
>would ever want move tapes around! Unbelievable. The other thing that
>seals the fat on these libraries is that they don't show you the tapes
>that are in the slots via the GUI panel. Our Quantum/ATL libraries will
>show you on the GUI each tape that's loaded in a slot. IT will show you
>the bar code, and if the tape doesn't have a barcode it will indicate
>that. The L80 shows nothing. You have to look through this narrow window
>into the box and physically eyeball the slots. Of course, it's dark in
>there. The least they could have done is put a light in there. I score
>these guys a D- on product convenience, at least on their lower end
>libraries, anyway. The higher end libraries may come with these features
>built-in. I guess their attitude was that they wanted to keep the GUI
>simple and leave all the advanced features to ancillary software via a
>WEB browser. I guess there's a WEB server built in that would allow
>connections via IP address of the library. Not sure. Haven't looked into
>it.
>
>As far as Solaris to Linux is concerned, I think the problem is that one
>OS is little Endian and the other is Big endian, and that could mean
>problems for the indexes when they're copied over. I've had at least one
>person tell me this. We need to do the same thing, though, since our
>primary server is on Solaris and we'd like to move it to Redhat Linux.
>
>George
>
>
>WE, too, are running our primary server on a Sun and would like to
>switch it to Linux, but I don't recall the hangup with this. I think the
>indexes are little endian versus big endian, and t hat could be a
>problem
>
>
>
>
>Matt Hemingway wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just wondering if anybody has any experience migrating Networker Server
running on a Solaris 8 box to a Linux box?
>>
>> Also, if anybody has any experience with a StorageTek tape library
running on Linux that would be helpfull as well.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> -Matt
>>
>> --
>> ================
>> Matt Hemingway
>> PCNAlert
>> www.pcnalert.com
>> 626-585-2788
>> ================
>>
>> --
>> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>> also view and post messages to the list.
>> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list.
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>