Re: [Networker] Restore questions
2005-06-16 17:18:56
On Jun 16, 2005, at 5:05 PM, Werth, Dave wrote:
Folks,
We had a total failure of a RAID array on our main server. After
it took
the IBM tech's 2 days to get the hardware fixed we've started a
restore and
it's going a lot slower than we'd like (it'll take 2 or 3 days to
restore at
the present rate). I wondered it anyone out there would have any
suggestions for speeding up the process. At this point though I'm
reluctant
to stop the restore we've got going unless I'm pretty sure I can
improve the
speed enough to make a difference.
Our systems are as follows:
Backup Server: Windows 2K, Legato 6.1.3 (I know I need to upgrade,
it'll
happen in the next 3 months), Spectralogic 10K tape library with 2
AIT-2
tape drives, 100M network connection.
Server being restored: Windows 2K, Legato 6.1.3, RAID array with 3
logical
drives (E:, F:, G:), 100M networking. The system disk was ok.
We have about 250GB to restore and it appears to be going at about
2GB/hour
at this point.
To restore the drives we just opened Networker User on the restore
system,
clicked on the 3 drives and told it to start.
I could give more information but it's probably better to answer any
specific questions you may have.
We will be upgrading to AIT-4 tapes and Networker 7.x before too
long but
that doesn't do us any good now :-(
You should do a saveset recover, which is not what you described. A
saveset
recover is the fastest option because NetWorker does not need to hit
its database
for each file that needs to be restored.
This won't help you now, but you should look at the possibility of
upgrading
the network connection on both the client and the NetWorker server to
gigabit
ethernet if your network can handle that speed.
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Restore questions, Werth, Dave
- Re: [Networker] Restore questions,
Stanley Horwitz <=
- Re: [Networker] Restore questions, Fields, David
- Re: [Networker] Restore questions, Werth, Dave
- Re: [Networker] Restore questions, Stan Horwitz
- Re: [Networker] Restore questions, Werth, Dave
- Re: [Networker] Restore questions, Werth, Dave
- Re: [Networker] Restore questions, Werth, Dave
|
|
|