We are not doing compression on the clients.  We have one HPUX dedicated
storage node, two Linux storage nodes and the server is also Linux.

After looking at some of the volumes it does not look like we are having
an issue with the multiple OS's on the same tape.

Jon

On Mon, 2005-04-25 at 20:59 +0100, Davina Treiber wrote:
> Jon Fraley wrote:
> > My jukebox has LTO-2 tape drives in it.  I am trying to figure out why
> > some tapes are marked full at 205-207GB and others get up to 400GB
> > running the same groups to them.  These are all brand new tapes and
> > drives.  
> > 
> 
> The other responses are all valid, but there is another possibility. You
> may not actually be using compression on all of the drives. Do you have
> a mixture of storage nodes, perhaps even different operating systems?
> There are various factors that might influence this, for example:
> 
> Solaris: different device names, cbn, hbn etc, or different settings in
> st.conf.
> HP-UX: Different tape drivers or different settings on the devices.
> AIX: settings in SMIT.
> etc.
> 
> 205-207GB is the native capacity of the drives, so if you ARE using
> compression, then the data being written is extremely incompressible,
> unlikely for mixed filesystem data unless your applications are creating
> vast amounts of zip files.
> 
> Another possibility is that you are using software compression on some
> clients, thus causing NetWorker to report the capacity differently.
> Opinions differ, but I believe that in most cases you are best to let
> the drives take care of the compression rather than the clients.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=