The box your doing the mmrecov on has the exact same name as the original
server ??

Run a scanner -vvvv tapedrivename

It will report the block size that the volume was written at.  Make
sure your current scsi configuration supports this block size.


Robert Maiello
Pioneer Data Systems


On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:09:40 -0500, Ciolek, Ken <Ken.Ciolek AT AIG DOT COM> 
wrote:

>Davina,
>
>They never upgraded to W2k and stuck with NT4. Everything is the same as
>prior to the crash (hardware, server) I don't have any bootstrap information
>but two tapes in the drives from the backups prior to the crash. I scanned
>the one tape and found the bootstrap but when I try to run MMRECOV it aborts
>with the error message below. I contacted Legato and they had me try and
>restore the information from that SSID to another folder but no good. I am
>in the process of scanning the other tape to hopefully find another
>bootstrap. Any ideas on what is causing that error message? Legato said that
>the tape did not exist in the media database at the time the bootstrap was
>run.
>
>Uasm: Invalid Save Stream
>>
>> Tries to mount tape and then rejects with RAP error and exits with return
>> code 1 Also in the message Tape# not in the media index..cannot mount
>volume.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Davina Treiber [mailto:Treiber AT hotpop DOT com]
>Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 4:49 AM
>To: Legato NetWorker discussion; Ciolek, Ken
>Subject: Re: [Networker] FW: MMRECOV
>
>Ciolek, Ken wrote:
>>
>>
>>   _____
>>
>> From: Ciolek, Ken
>> Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:21 AM
>> To: 'Legato NetWorker discussion'
>> Subject: MMRECOV
>>
>>
>> I am in the process of rebuilding a Networker server and trying to run the
>> MMRECOV and fails with the following error. Any ideas?
>>
>> Uasm: Invalid Save Stream
>>
>> Tries to mount tape and then rejects with RAP error and exits with return
>> code 1
>
>Did you decide to use the same hardware and software as before or did
>you upgrade to Windows 2000?
>
>My gut feeling would be that this is a block size issue, and related in
>some way to the old chestnut about scatter/gather buffers. This could
>relate to a different SCSI driver in use.
>
>As an example, I have seen NT4 systems using Compaq SCSI cards where the
>driver allowed 128KB block size by default. The system was rebuilt with
>a newer NT4 build that incorporated a newer version of the SCSI driver,
>but by default could only support 64KB block size. In this case Compaq
>support were no help and could not provide any way to change this. I
>never resolved this particular issue, and to my knowledge the customer
>just lived with the fact that recovering from old tapes was near impossible.
>
>Give us some more detail...
>
>--
>Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
>to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
>http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
>also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
>should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
>=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=