Networker

Re: [Networker] Very Frustrating Problem

2005-02-17 20:55:58
Subject: Re: [Networker] Very Frustrating Problem
From: Ken Gehring <kgehring AT MYREALBOX DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:48:28 -0700
Well, I thank you all for the ideas. We don't have the /etc/stinit.def file
so changing/editing that is out.
I think I have a plan of attack now.

1) we will try the latest Adaptec driver (6.3.9) if it works great
    if not
2) next we will try the "old" adaptec driver (aic7xxx_old)
    if that doesn't work
3) we will go to our LSI cards again
   if htat doesn't work ...... I would hate to have to try Win 2k3

If you have more ideas send them along. I'll keep you all posted as to our
progress and
if we find a resolution I'll post instructions on how to implement it.

Ken

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ken Gehring" <kgehring AT MYREALBOX DOT COM>
To: <NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU>
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: [Networker] Very Frustrating Problem


> We are running Networker 6.1.4 (upgraded from 6.1.3 etc) on RedHat AS 3.0
with the latest kernel 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp and we have also tried the 2.4.29
kernel. The Jukebox is a Storagetek L-80 with 8 SDLT drives (set up 2 per
scsi channel and the picker on its own channel). The scsi cards are 3
Adaptec 39160 cards (we've also tried Buslogic cards). The computer is an HP
ML370 with 6GB of memory and about 200GB of disk and dual  2.8GHz
processors. We've also tried this with similar Dell hardware (Dell 4600
configured about the same as the HP).
>
> Now to the problem. We keep getting an inordinate number of scsi bus
resets (varies from 6 to 20 per day). We get tape drives that disappear (no
device present) or get into a state where they are useable but you can't
eject the tape.
>
> We've tried a lot of configuration changes and are now experimenting with
changing the command queueing depth to the tape drives (we've tried the
default of 32 as well as 16, 8 and 4 all with no success).
>
> Has anyone seen this type of problem or behavior? Did you manage to
resolve the problem? How?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Ken Gehring
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
> to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
> should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
>

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list. Questions regarding this list
should be sent to stan AT temple DOT edu
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=