Networker

Re: [Networker] nsrck hung?

2004-09-17 13:57:21
Subject: Re: [Networker] nsrck hung?
From: George Sinclair <George.Sinclair AT NOAA DOT GOV>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2004 14:00:56 -0400
Okay, command finally completed about an hour and half later with:

nsrck: completed recovery of index for client 'fred'

nsrck: /disk3/nsr_index/fred contains 34769860 records occupying 5181 MB
nsrck: Completed checking 2 client(s)

One thing I noticed was the 'du -sk index' was reporting large and
larger sizes everytime I ran it, so it became obvious that it was still
chugging along. Apparently, after the index is actually recovered from
tape, which is pretty fast, it must then be merged in. nsrck doesn't
tell you anything about what it's doing once it recovers it from tape,
though. I guess I could have run this in verbose mode, but not sure how
much detailed info that would have generated. It would be nice if nsrck
would say something about each category of major steps, as it completes
them, without having to have verbose mode turned on. Maybe something
like: "Now merging", etc.

George

George Sinclair wrote:
>
> I ran the following command to recover and merge in an older client
> index:
>
> nsrck -L 7 -t 11/30/03 07:34:54 fred
>
> Guess I should have put single quotes around the whole time, Anyway, I
> scripted the command and here's what happens:
>
> nsrck: checking index for '07:34:54'
> nsrck: File index error: `07:34:54' is not a registered client
> nsrck: checking index for 'fred'
> nsrck: The file index for client 'fred' will be recovered.
> nsrck: Recovering index savesets of 'fred' from 'server'
> Recover completion time: Fri Sep 17 11:44:43 2004
>
> Looks like it finished, but nsrck command is still running?! The prompt
> never returned. I'm still scripting it and nothing more has happened.
> Not sure what nsrck is doing? Is there more work to do after it recovers
> the index? I ran a 'du -sk' against the size of the index before and
> it's much bigger than it was prior. Also, 'ls -lRt index' shows entries
> under there from the date specified and earlier, so looks like it
> worked, but not sure why it never came back with a prompt?
>
> George
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>