On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 02:16:55 -0400, Joel Tampubolon <jtampubo AT CNOOC.CO DOT 
ID>
wrote:

>I think you all misunderstood.
I thought we might have.

>Previously Backup server Verson 6.0 Build 153 and the client 5.5.1.
>
>I did not upgrade the server , I only upgraded the client to version 6.0
>Build 153, the same as the backup server.
>
>The reason I upgrade the client is , to support directed recovery from the
>server.
>The directed recovery only works, if we have the same version between
>client and the server.
>
>But the funny thing, this problem only happened to a specific save sets/
>file system on that client. ( note : this file system I restored using
>directed recovery from Server).

OK, so you do have a supported configuration. However 6.0 is a very bad
choice of version. Sooner or later, you _will_ experience media database
corruption if you continue to use this version, and this won't be a
pleasant experience. The bug was fixed in 6.0.1, but if you are going to
upgrade I suggest you go to 6.1.3.

The problem you are seeing is also a bug. This is also fixed in some later
versions.

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=