Networker

Re: [Networker] Disk Backup Hardware

2003-05-14 09:20:52
Subject: Re: [Networker] Disk Backup Hardware
From: Matthew Ho <matthew.ho AT STORAGEASP DOT NET>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 09:16:22 -0400
We have tested ATTO Diamond FC Disk Array with Networker 7.0 and Veritas 
VxVM/VxFS for disk backup.  When creating the VxFS partition as "file device", 
you need to set the file system >2GB setting.  Networker shows the volume is 
full after 10% of disk utilization if ">2GB setting" is not on.

However, we found the use of VxVM/VxFS not necessary for diskbackup as 
NetWorker uses another file device volume once the first previous one is full.  
The need to dynamically resize the volume is not necessary.  Also, software 
RAID performs much worse than hardware RAID.

Matthew

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Fisher [mailto:jfisher AT WFUBMC DOT EDU]
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 8:23 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Disk Backup Hardware


Does anyone know if it would matter if the File Type device is vxfs?
Anyone doing this now?

Joel

-----Original Message-----
From: Vitaly Porotikov [mailto:vitaly.porotikov AT nikkocitigroup DOT com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 14, 2003 3:36 AM
To: Legato NetWorker discussion; Joel Fisher
Subject: Re: [Networker] Disk Backup Hardware

   Joel,

   We tried to do it on RaidZone machines (www.consensys.com) but trough
very unstable OpenNAS (RedHat Linux installed on Raidzone) we got rid of
this idea. So my advice before buy any hardware check filesystem
performance
and tolerance  carefully  with big files (>100GB).


--
Yours,  Vitaly Porotikov aka vp12929 on ws22a963
 The superior man understands what is right; the inferior man
understands
 what will sell.
                -- Confucius





Joel Fisher wrote:

> Hey All,
>
>
>
> This is kind of off-topic...
>
>
>
> Anyone extensively using File Type devices?  By extensive I mean most
of
> you data is written to disk first then staged/cloned to tape.
>
>
>
> What are you using for the File Type devices?
>
>
>
> Anyone using an ATA raid array(Claiiron CX600, Nexsan Ataboy,
StorageTek
> BladeStore)?  Comments?
>
>
>
> I'm looking into the upcoming ATAbeast from Nexsan and I'm impressed
by
> the price/meg.  Does anyone have experience with any Nexsan ATA based
> arrays, either as File Type devices or in general use?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Joel
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email
> to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
> http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
> also view and post messages to the list.
> =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>