Networker

Re: [Networker] How reliable our your windows backups?

2003-04-30 10:58:45
Subject: Re: [Networker] How reliable our your windows backups?
From: "Neild, Jim" <Jim.Neild AT SSHA.ON DOT CA>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:58:06 -0400
Can you outline your configuration (i.e. SCSI/SAN?, Media Manager?, NW
version and platform, etc.)

Cheers,
Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: McDougal, Philip H [mailto:PMcDougal AT JENNER DOT COM] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 10:55 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] How reliable our your windows backups?


I back up 40 NT/2000 clients and 10 Novell clients.  I never have any
issues with the Windows clients unless someone makes changes to the
client systems and doesn't tell me.  The Novell clients on the other
hand have always been a nightmare.  Thankfully, we are slowly getting
rid of our Novell boxes.  Our windows environment has been quite clean
and is prone to be error free (knock on wood).  I have no complaints
towards these clients since they have been quite reliable for us.

Regards,
Phil M.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paula Ehn [mailto:pehn AT CC.UMANITOBA DOT CA]
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 9:45 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] How reliable our your windows backups?


Presently, we backup about ~40 Solaris boxes and very reliably. It has
been dictated from higher up that we look at backing up NT/W2k servers.

>From this thread, it seems like we might be opening the flood gates to
many problems and reliability issues.

What type of problems have people been having with NT/W2k server backups
to a Solaris backup server? I also heard that there was in the past a
problem with backing up the Windows registry. Is this still a problem?

Thanks!
Paula

On Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:01:20 -0400, Joel Fisher <jfisher AT WFUBMC DOT EDU>
wrote:

>I have noticed the exact same pattern.  We have a different mix 130NT 
>and 40Unix.  But there are very rarely problems with the Unix clients, 
>while there is almost never a night that doesn't have NT failures.  
>I've not figured out a way to make the NT clients more reliable (then 
>again neither has Bill).
>
>If any NT gurus have figured this out I'd like to hear what they've 
>done also.
 -----------------------------------------------------------------
| Paula Ehn  VE4MHZ/VE4HZ                    Room 624 Eng.        |
| Unix System Administrator                  pehn AT cc.umanitoba DOT ca |
| Academic Computing and Networking          (204)474-7849        |
| University of Manitoba                     Fax: (204) 474-7920  |
 -----------------------------------------------------------------

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also
view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via
email to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can also
view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=