Hi,

been following this list for some while and have some thoughts
on why there seems to be different opinions on this:

At least earlier (pre 6.x ?) Networker worked in different ways
depending on the way you did cloning:
- asking it to clone a volume WOULD do demultiplexing of the savesets
  and thus be very slow, this was (is) a definite problem
- feeding nsrclone a list of savesets did try to optimize the cloning speed
  and did not do demultiplexing.

I haven't tested this for some while, but if it is still true, it would explain
why people seems to have different opinions on the matter.

Perhaps someone has the time to test this?

BRGDS


-- 
Dag Nygren                               email: dag AT newtech DOT fi
Oy Espoon NewTech Ab                     phone: +358 9 8024910
Träsktorpet 3                              fax: +358 9 8024916
02360 ESBO                              Mobile: +358 400 426312
FINLAND

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=