Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?
2003-04-24 03:49:43
Tarjei,
not sure, but if you want to make sure that it demuxes, i suggest you look into
xargs
report_to_generate_ssids_to_be_cloned | xargs -n 1 -I {} -x nsrclone
Kind Regards,
Kris
-----Original Message-----
From: Tarjei T. Jensen [mailto:tarjei.jensen AT KVAERNER DOT COM]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 9:35 AM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?
Terry Clayton wrote:
>After checking a couple of internal Legato sources to be quite certain the
>algorithm is as follows...
>
>nsrclone SSID1, SSID2, SSID3.....SSIDX will move data from the source to
>the target without any change to the data and no tape thrashing.....
>
>If a tape has 4 savesets interleaved, the data chunks are moved
>in order and laid down exactly without any de-deinterleaving - and then
>re-interleaving the data.
>
>If you want to de-interleave the data then:
>
> nsrclone SSID1
> nsrclone SSID2
> nsrclone SSID3
> nsrclone SSID4
>
>In this case the data is read and written one save set at a time
>and the source tape is repositioned accordingly, while the target tape
>device has the savesets sequentially written. and of course it takes 4
times
>as long to complete than the previous case.
What will networker do if we pipe the saveset IDs to nsrclone?
e.g. report_to_generate_ssids_to_be_cloned | nsrclone
Is this the same as 1 or 2 above?
Greetings,
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, (continued)
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Tarjei T. Jensen
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Joel Fisher
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Joel Fisher
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Peacock, Tom
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Joel Fisher
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Terry Clayton
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Shaun Ellis
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Tarjei T. Jensen
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?,
Vandecruys Kris <=
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Tarjei T. Jensen
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Jim McAlarney
- Re: [Networker] Merits of cloning versus dual backups?, Gaddy
|
|
|