Koen ,

I have modified the script that tests if clients are switched off to update 
the 'storage nodes' attribute with alternate values of  "s_node1 , s_node2" 
and "s_node2,s_node1" lets see what that will bring tonight.

Maarten

On Wednesday 12 March 2003 13:47, VERHAEGHE Koen (BMB) wrote:
> Maarten,
>
> Streams will only go to the next storage node of the affinity list is
> all devices are disabled on the previous one. So 'read open error, I/O
> error' and other error states of the drives do not help; they all really
> need to be disbled.
> I'm not happy with how this works either, but anyways ...
>
> Open for suggestions though...
>
> Cheers
> Koen
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maarten Boot (CWEU-USERS/CWNL)
> [mailto:maarten.boot AT NL.COMPUWARE DOT COM]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:18 PM
> To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
> Subject: [Networker] Storage Nodes, and Clients
>
>
> Storagenodes are new to me, and in my assumption that I could use
> storagenodes
> as a loadbalancing feature I seem to be mistaken.
>
> I defined a storage node and defined a autoloader to it.
>
> setting the sarver paralellism to 24 and the autoloader on the server to
> 12
> and the remote autoloader also to 12 I hopeed to get increased
> throughput on
> both my tapedrives. Unfortunately on closer inspection data only flows
> to the
> server not to the storage node, ( yes all clients have both machines in
> the
> "storage nodes" field. If the 12 streams have been reached on the Server
> I
> see no data going to the Storage node. Is there a timeouit involved that
> I
> can set ?
>
> Slightly puzzeled again by Networker, Maarten

--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff networker" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=