Networker

Re: [Networker] SDLT 220 Vs 320

2002-11-12 09:06:39
Subject: Re: [Networker] SDLT 220 Vs 320
From: Paul Crossman <pcrossma AT WILDFIRE DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTMAIL.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:06:33 -0500
I'm in the process of doing this, and I selected 220 drives for the
simple fact that I could still read my DLT7000 tapes.  I believe that
the 320 drives can not read the DLT7000 media.

Paul C.

On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 00:07, SUBSCRIBE NETWORKER Anonymous wrote:

    Dear Admins,

    We are considering upgrading from our DLT7000 jukebox(28 slots, 2 drives)
    running Networker 5.5.1 to a SDLT jukebox.

    We are considering using 220/320 drives. Some of the posts earlier this
    week, point out at problems in 220 drives(which have been around for a
    while now). This makes me wary of 320 drives(esp when they come out new)
    I also am told of a similar problem with 8000 drives when they first
    shipped out.

    The price difference between the 2 drives is also nnot a lot.

    Your views on the same are much appreciated and any recommendations on
    libraries are most welcome.

    Regards,

    Bit Bucket.

    /dev/null

    --
    Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
    to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
    http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
    also view and post messages to the list.
    =*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

--
Paul Crossman @ Wildfire Communications, Inc.
Senior Unix Systems Administrator
Phone & Fax:  781-778-3517
Email:  pcrossma AT wildfire DOT com


--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>