Re: [Networker] SDLT 220 Vs 320
2002-11-12 09:06:39
I'm in the process of doing this, and I selected 220 drives for the
simple fact that I could still read my DLT7000 tapes. I believe that
the 320 drives can not read the DLT7000 media.
Paul C.
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 00:07, SUBSCRIBE NETWORKER Anonymous wrote:
Dear Admins,
We are considering upgrading from our DLT7000 jukebox(28 slots, 2 drives)
running Networker 5.5.1 to a SDLT jukebox.
We are considering using 220/320 drives. Some of the posts earlier this
week, point out at problems in 220 drives(which have been around for a
while now). This makes me wary of 320 drives(esp when they come out new)
I also am told of a similar problem with 8000 drives when they first
shipped out.
The price difference between the 2 drives is also nnot a lot.
Your views on the same are much appreciated and any recommendations on
libraries are most welcome.
Regards,
Bit Bucket.
/dev/null
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
--
Paul Crossman @ Wildfire Communications, Inc.
Senior Unix Systems Administrator
Phone & Fax: 781-778-3517
Email: pcrossma AT wildfire DOT com
--
Note: To sign off this list, send a "signoff" command via email
to listserv AT listmail.temple DOT edu or visit the list's Web site at
http://listmail.temple.edu/archives/networker.html where you can
also view and post messages to the list.
=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=*=
|
|
|